FAIR is the framework that broke cyber risk out of red, amber, green. It treats a risk scenario as a probability distribution rather than a colour, and expresses the answer in the same units the rest of the business uses (euros or dollars per year).
The mechanics are deliberately simple. Loss is decomposed into loss event frequency (how often the bad thing happens) and loss magnitude (how much it costs when it does). Each factor is further decomposed: frequency into threat event frequency and the susceptibility of the controls; magnitude into primary and secondary loss. Each leaf node is a three-point estimate (minimum, most likely, maximum) supplied by people who know the business. A Monte Carlo simulation rolls the distributions up.
What you get is annual loss expectancy expressed as a range, not a heatmap colour. That changes the conversations you can have. A board can compare risk to control investment; an underwriter can assess your insurance ceiling; a procurement team can build risk-based supplier requirements. None of those work when risk is expressed as "high" or "medium". The Risk Investigation Agent uses FAIR (specifically the Open FAIR variant) as its quantification engine.



